The institution h-index is computed as for a person, on the distinct papers with at least one author of the field from this institution: 14 papers with at least 14 citations each. It grows with the number of people and years: read it next to the staff size, not to compare institutions of different size.
Out of 45 papers. The three shares do not add up to one hundred: a paper can answer yes to more than one question. They describe how people work, not how well: a very cohesive institution and a very open one are two different ways of doing research, not one better than the other.
The first share is not shown: with fewer than three people in the field it would be zero by necessity, not by choice.
| Name | Role | Years since first publication | h-index | Citations | Pubs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Debolini | Other qualified | 19 | 14 | 877 | 45 |
The area of each box is proportional to the number of papers: it shows at a glance where the research of this institution concentrates. Click a topic for its page.
How much a topic weighs here compared with the whole field: above 1 there is specialisation, below 1 the topic is less present than average. The grey tick marks parity. Topics with fewer than three papers are excluded, where the ratio would say little.
| Topic | Papers | Relative specialisation | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil and land use | 14 | 10.58 | |
| Spatial analysis and GIS | 11 | 6.87 | |
| Landscape and rural heritage | 5 | 5.30 | |
| Urban agriculture and urban food policy | 4 | 3.72 | |
| Water management | 5 | 3.59 | |
| Knowledge, extension and human capital | 4 | 3.59 | |
| Climate change and adaptation | 6 | 2.01 | |
| Innovation and technology adoption | 6 | 1.66 | |
| Qualitative methods and reviews | 4 | 1.60 | |
| Econometric and statistical methods | 4 | 1.31 | |
| Food supply chains | 4 | 0.83 | |
| Governance and institutions | 6 | 0.80 |