The institution h-index is computed as for a person, on the distinct papers with at least one author of the field from this institution: 11 papers with at least 11 citations each. It grows with the number of people and years: read it next to the staff size, not to compare institutions of different size.
Out of 31 papers. The three shares do not add up to one hundred: a paper can answer yes to more than one question. They describe how people work, not how well: a very cohesive institution and a very open one are two different ways of doing research, not one better than the other.
| Name | Role | Years since first publication | h-index | Citations | Pubs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Carzedda | Researcher | 9 | 8 | 234 | 19 |
| Gianluigi Gallenti | Full professor | 11 | 8 | 249 | 12 |
| Sonia Prestamburgo | Full professor | 15 | 5 | 72 | 6 |
The area of each box is proportional to the number of papers: it shows at a glance where the research of this institution concentrates. Click a topic for its page.
How much a topic weighs here compared with the whole field: above 1 there is specialisation, below 1 the topic is less present than average. The grey tick marks parity. Topics with fewer than three papers are excluded, where the ratio would say little.
| Topic | Papers | Relative specialisation | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable consumption and diets | 3 | 4.38 | |
| Choice experiments | 7 | 3.56 | |
| Climate change and adaptation | 5 | 2.43 | |
| Econometric and statistical methods | 5 | 2.38 | |
| Consumer behaviour | 11 | 2.33 | |
| Wine economics | 4 | 1.89 | |
| Willingness to pay | 3 | 1.77 | |
| Ecosystem services and biodiversity | 3 | 1.54 | |
| Sustainability assessment | 5 | 1.15 |